Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
10 pending office actions • 4 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 23 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (10%) |
| §103 only | 7 (70%) |
| §112 only | 1 (10%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (10%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B | 1 | 47.6% | +31.0% |
| SHAHNAMI, AMIR | 1 | 81.5% | +10.0% |
| AZARIAN, SEYED H | 1 | 89.5% | +12.0% |
| GARCIA, SANTIAGO | 1 | 88.0% | +13.4% |
| WILLIAMS, REBECCA COLETTE | 1 | 40.0% | +66.7% |
| BITAR, NANCY | 1 | 82.6% | +7.6% |
| MENBERU, BENIYAM | 1 | 74.0% | +13.1% |
| MILIA, MARK R | 1 | 58.7% | +22.3% |
| JONES, ANDREW B | 1 | 71.1% | +17.0% |
| CADEAU, WEDNEL | 1 | 71.5% | +19.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19257714 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES OF PATHOLOGY DATA AND REVIEWING THE PATHOLOGY DATA | SHAHNAMI, AMIR | — |
| 18920046 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO PRODUCE A TISSUE MAP VISUALIZATION | AZARIAN, SEYED H | — |
| 18908015 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGES OF SLIDES TO AUTOMATICALLY PRIORITIZE THE PROCESSED IMAGES OF SLIDES FOR DIGITAL PATHOLOGY | GARCIA, SANTIAGO | — |
| 18642080 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES FOR COMPUTATIONAL DETECTION METHODS | BITAR, NANCY | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19262549 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO PROVIDE AUTOMATED ROUTING OF DATA | BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18049220 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES FOR DETERMINING TREATMENT | CADEAU, WEDNEL | 18d overdue |
| 18179871 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES FOR MODEL SELECTION | JONES, ANDREW B | 8d overdue |
| 19262549 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO PROVIDE AUTOMATED ROUTING OF DATA | BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B | — |
| 19257714 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES OF PATHOLOGY DATA AND REVIEWING THE PATHOLOGY DATA | SHAHNAMI, AMIR | — |
| 18920046 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO PRODUCE A TISSUE MAP VISUALIZATION | AZARIAN, SEYED H | — |
| 18908015 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGES OF SLIDES TO AUTOMATICALLY PRIORITIZE THE PROCESSED IMAGES OF SLIDES FOR DIGITAL PATHOLOGY | GARCIA, SANTIAGO | — |
| 18894147 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGES TO PREPARE SLIDES FOR PROCESSED IMAGES FOR DIGITAL PATHOLOGY | WILLIAMS, REBECCA COLETTE | — |
| 18521903 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES USING DEEP FOUNDATION MODELS | MENBERU, BENIYAM | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2681 | 2 |
| 2664 | 1 |
| 2667 | 1 |
| 2632 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19262549 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO PROVIDE AUTOMATED ROUTING OF DATA | BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B | — | §101§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 08, 2025 |
| 19257714 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES OF PATHOLOGY DATA AND REVIEWING THE PATHOLOGY DATA | SHAHNAMI, AMIR | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 02, 2025 |
| 18920046 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO PRODUCE A TISSUE MAP VISUALIZATION | AZARIAN, SEYED H | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 18, 2024 |
| 18908015 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGES OF SLIDES TO AUTOMATICALLY PRIORITIZE THE PROCESSED IMAGES OF SLIDES FOR DIGITAL PATHOLOGY | GARCIA, SANTIAGO | — | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 07, 2024 |
| 18894147 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGES TO PREPARE SLIDES FOR PROCESSED IMAGES FOR DIGITAL PATHOLOGY | WILLIAMS, REBECCA COLETTE | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 24, 2024 |
| 18642080 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES FOR COMPUTATIONAL DETECTION METHODS | BITAR, NANCY | 2664 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 22, 2024 |
| 18521903 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES USING DEEP FOUNDATION MODELS | MENBERU, BENIYAM | 2681 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 28, 2023 |
| 18316736 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES WITH UPDATED PROTOCOLS | MILIA, MARK R | 2681 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 12, 2023 |
| 18179871 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES FOR MODEL SELECTION | JONES, ANDREW B | 2667 | §112 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Mar 07, 2023 |
| 18049220 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES FOR DETERMINING TREATMENT | CADEAU, WEDNEL | 2632 | §103 | Final Rejection | 18d overdue | Pending | Oct 24, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial