Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Panelclaw Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Panelclaw Inc. maintains 2 pending office actions focused in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. Both of these actions are housed within 1 distinct art unit, which centralizes the company's current prosecution efforts. The portfolio is being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners, ensuring that each pending matter has a dedicated point of contact. MARSH, STEVEN M serves as the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending office action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MARSH, STEVEN M 1 79.5% +7.9%
EPPS, TODD MICHAEL 1 72.7% +7.2%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18884828 Large Capacity Conductor Management Clip and Cover EPPS, TODD MICHAEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3632 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19072764 Solar Module Mounting System MARSH, STEVEN M — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2025
18884828 Large Capacity Conductor Management Clip and Cover EPPS, TODD MICHAEL 3632 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024

Managing Panelclaw Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month