Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Paragon 28 Inc.

13 pending office actions • 5 art units • 13 examiners • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 24 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 13 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 13 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (3)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
11
Medium (85%)
2
Easy (15%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only9 (69%)
§102 only2 (15%)
§112 only2 (15%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
13
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GIBSON, ERIC SHANE 1 85.6% +16.8%
LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES 1 73.6% +29.9%
BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J 1 83.4% +14.0%
HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY 1 78.1% +18.9%
JONES, DIANA S 1 74.5% +20.4%
KAMIKAWA, TRACY L 1 58.7% +36.8%
SIPP, AMY R. 1 70.5% +26.4%
PRESTON, REBECCA STRASZHEIM 1 73.6% +38.0%
DORNBUSCH, DIANNE 1 73.6% +35.3%
BAUTISTA, ADRIANA GISELLE 1

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18931929 ORTHOPEDIC INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS GIBSON, ERIC SHANE 47d
18896358 IMPLANTS, INSTRUMENTS, AND METHODS OF USE BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J 75d

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18923361 ORTHOPEDIC INSTRUMENTS LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES 49d overdue
18355722 SOFT TISSUE IMPLANTS, INSTRUMENTATION, AND METHODS DORNBUSCH, DIANNE 46d overdue
18482496 SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, GUIDES, AND METHODS OF USE KAMIKAWA, TRACY L 19d overdue
18477170 ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS AND METHODS PRESTON, REBECCA STRASZHEIM 15d overdue
18602627 IMPLANT, ALIGNMENT GUIDES, SYSTEM AND METHODS OF USE JONES, DIANA S 5d overdue
18480105 INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS FOR TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY SIPP, AMY R. 19d
18931929 ORTHOPEDIC INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS GIBSON, ERIC SHANE 47d
18787174 EXTERNAL FIXATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY 54d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3775 5
3774 5
3619 1
3773 1
3771 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18931929 ORTHOPEDIC INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS GIBSON, ERIC SHANE 3775 §103 Final Rejection 47d Pending Oct 30, 2024
18923361 ORTHOPEDIC INSTRUMENTS LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES 3619 §103 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Oct 22, 2024
18896358 IMPLANTS, INSTRUMENTS, AND METHODS OF USE BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J 3775 §103 Final Rejection 75d Pending Sep 25, 2024
18787174 EXTERNAL FIXATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY 3773 §112 Final Rejection 54d Pending Jul 29, 2024
18602627 IMPLANT, ALIGNMENT GUIDES, SYSTEM AND METHODS OF USE JONES, DIANA S 3775 §112 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Mar 12, 2024
18482496 SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, GUIDES, AND METHODS OF USE KAMIKAWA, TRACY L 3775 §103 Non-Final OA 19d overdue Pending Oct 06, 2023
18480105 INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS FOR TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY SIPP, AMY R. 3775 §103 Non-Final OA 19d Pending Oct 03, 2023
18477170 ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS AND METHODS PRESTON, REBECCA STRASZHEIM 3774 §102 Non-Final OA 15d overdue Pending Sep 28, 2023
18355722 SOFT TISSUE IMPLANTS, INSTRUMENTATION, AND METHODS DORNBUSCH, DIANNE 3771 §103 Non-Final OA 46d overdue Pending Jul 20, 2023
18298027 SURGICAL METHODS FOR PROCEDURES OF THE SUBTALAR JOINT BAUTISTA, ADRIANA GISELLE 3774 §103 Final Rejection 77d Pending Apr 10, 2023
18064711 IMPLANTS AND METHODS OF USE, ASSEMBLY AND FABRICATION HU, ANN M 3774 §102 Final Rejection 27d Pending Dec 12, 2022
17653029 METHODS FOR PERFORMING AN ARTHROPLASTY OF THE SUBTALAR JOINT HOBAN, MELISSA A 3774 §103 Final Rejection 16d Pending Mar 01, 2022
17448273 IMPLANTS, ALIGNMENT GUIDES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D 3774 §103 Final Rejection 50d Pending Sep 21, 2021

Managing Paragon 28 Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month