Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Penland Foundation

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The Penland Foundation currently has 4 pending office actions distributed within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are spread across 4 distinct examiners, which indicates that each pending matter is being handled by a different individual. Despite the variety of examiners, the work is contained within 2 distinct art units, suggesting some level of thematic grouping at the patent office.

BORGEEST, CHRISTINA M is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, although she is responsible for only 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This highlights an even distribution of the 4 pending office actions among the 4 distinct examiners. Practitioners working in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector for this entity must prepare for 4 separate examiner perspectives across the 2 distinct art units involved.

The concentration of 4 pending office actions within 2 distinct art units suggests that while the examiners differ, the technical focus remains relatively narrow. With 4 distinct examiners managing the 4 pending office actions, there is no single point of contact for the majority of the portfolio. This structure requires managing individual prosecution timelines simultaneously within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals space.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
2
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PAGUIO FRISING, MICHELLE F 1 71.1% +39.3%
BORGEEST, CHRISTINA M 1 55.6% +21.4%
GREENE, IVAN A 1 18.7% +6.4%
CURRENS, GRANT CARSON 1 54.6% +62.5%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18392640 TREATMENT OF DELIRIUM USING NITROUS OXIDE GREENE, IVAN A —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17987653 TREATMENT OF CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIA USING BOTULINUM TOXIN CURRENS, GRANT CARSON 31d overdue
18392662 TREATMENT OF ACUTE HEART FAILURE USING NITROUS OXIDE AND CHRONIC HEART FAILURE USING BOTULINUM TOXIN PAGUIO FRISING, MICHELLE F 21d
18392612 TREATMENT OF THE DEMENTIAS USING BOTULINUM TOXIN BORGEEST, CHRISTINA M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1651 2
1619 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18392662 TREATMENT OF ACUTE HEART FAILURE USING NITROUS OXIDE AND CHRONIC HEART FAILURE USING BOTULINUM TOXIN PAGUIO FRISING, MICHELLE F 1651 §103Other Final Rejection 21d Pending Dec 21, 2023
18392612 TREATMENT OF THE DEMENTIAS USING BOTULINUM TOXIN BORGEEST, CHRISTINA M — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 21, 2023
18392640 TREATMENT OF DELIRIUM USING NITROUS OXIDE GREENE, IVAN A 1619 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 21, 2023
17987653 TREATMENT OF CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIA USING BOTULINUM TOXIN CURRENS, GRANT CARSON 1651 §112DP Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Nov 15, 2022

Managing Penland Foundation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month