Technology area: Computing & Software
7 pending office actions • 7 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 18 patents granted in the last 365 days
Petal Cloud Technology Co. Ltd. is currently managing 7 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These 7 actions are spread across 7 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is handling exactly one case. Furthermore, the portfolio is distributed across 7 distinct art units, showing a high degree of technical and administrative fragmentation.
BEKERMAN, MICHAEL is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. The equal count of pending actions, examiners, and art units is a notable characteristic of this portfolio. This suggests that the company's software-related filings are diverse enough to trigger reviews from many different specialized groups within the USPTO, each with its own specific focus.
Such a wide spread requires the company to adapt to 7 different sets of examiner expectations and art unit practices simultaneously. This decentralized structure means that no single examiner's decision-making process dominates the company's prosecution experience. Instead, the company must maintain a versatile strategy to address the unique requirements of many different administrative units within the Computing & Software sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (29%) |
| §103 only | 5 (71%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BEKERMAN, MICHAEL | 1 | 32.9% | +30.2% |
| HUERTA, ALEXANDER Q | 1 | 68.1% | +11.2% |
| GALERA, PATRICK PAUL CONTRER | 1 | 76.9% | +27.3% |
| HEBERT, THEODORE E | 1 | 74.2% | +14.2% |
| JEON, JAE UK | 1 | 74.8% | +44.3% |
| ORR, HENRY W | 1 | 50.6% | +37.3% |
| SHIBEROU, MAHELET | 1 | 73.7% | +26.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19080340 | Advertisement Delivery Method and Apparatus, Cloud Server, and Readable Storage Medium | BEKERMAN, MICHAEL | 27d |
| 18424900 | APPLICATION CONTROL METHOD AND SYSTEM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | JEON, JAE UK | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18276136 | PICTURE SHARING METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | SHIBEROU, MAHELET | 147d overdue |
| 18694585 | APPLICATION INSTALLATION METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE | HEBERT, THEODORE E | 6d |
| 19080340 | Advertisement Delivery Method and Apparatus, Cloud Server, and Readable Storage Medium | BEKERMAN, MICHAEL | 27d |
| 19072278 | Video Playback Method, Terminal Device, Apparatus, System, and Storage Medium | HUERTA, ALEXANDER Q | — |
| 18724807 | PICTURE SHARING METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | GALERA, PATRICK PAUL CONTRER | — |
| 18424900 | APPLICATION CONTROL METHOD AND SYSTEM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | JEON, JAE UK | — |
| 18545140 | SHORTCUT ICON DISPLAY METHOD AND TERMINAL DEVICE | ORR, HENRY W | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3621 | 1 |
| 2425 | 1 |
| 2617 | 1 |
| 2199 | 1 |
| 2193 | 1 |
| 2172 | 1 |
| 2171 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19080340 | Advertisement Delivery Method and Apparatus, Cloud Server, and Readable Storage Medium | BEKERMAN, MICHAEL | 3621 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Mar 14, 2025 |
| 19072278 | Video Playback Method, Terminal Device, Apparatus, System, and Storage Medium | HUERTA, ALEXANDER Q | 2425 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 06, 2025 |
| 18724807 | PICTURE SHARING METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | GALERA, PATRICK PAUL CONTRER | 2617 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 27, 2024 |
| 18694585 | APPLICATION INSTALLATION METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE | HEBERT, THEODORE E | 2199 | §103 | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | Mar 22, 2024 |
| 18424900 | APPLICATION CONTROL METHOD AND SYSTEM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | JEON, JAE UK | 2193 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 29, 2024 |
| 18545140 | SHORTCUT ICON DISPLAY METHOD AND TERMINAL DEVICE | ORR, HENRY W | 2172 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 19, 2023 |
| 18276136 | PICTURE SHARING METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | SHIBEROU, MAHELET | 2171 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 147d overdue | Pending | Aug 07, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPetal Cloud Technology Co. Ltd. has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 7 art units and 7 examiners.
Michael Bekerman has the most, with 1 of Petal Cloud Technology Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
