Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 23 patents granted in the last 365 days
Pgytech Co. Ltd. is engaged in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company's patent portfolio currently features 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, representing a concentrated prosecution effort at this time. The active filing is situated within 1 distinct art unit.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MAI, TRI M, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. As the company only has 1 pending office action in total, this examiner handles all current active prosecution for the firm. This data indicates a very narrow scope of current activity within the patent office. Practitioners can focus their resources on the specific requirements of the 1 distinct art unit and the examination style of MAI, TRI M.
The lack of multiple pending actions or examiners suggests that the company may be pursuing a highly selective patenting strategy within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field. With only 1 pending office action, the portfolio's immediate growth is dependent on the resolution of this single matter. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit simplifies the technical oversight required for the company's current filings. The progress of the company's current filings is tied to the specific examination patterns of MAI, TRI M, who manages 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAI, TRI M | 2 | 36.3% | +20.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19017164 | Trolley Bag | MAI, TRI M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18898462 | Assembly Structure for Suitcase | MAI, TRI M | 56d |
| 19017164 | Trolley Bag | MAI, TRI M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3733 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19017164 | Trolley Bag | MAI, TRI M | 3733 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 10, 2025 |
| 18898462 | Assembly Structure for Suitcase | MAI, TRI M | 3733 | §103 | Final Rejection | 56d | Pending | Sep 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial