Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Pharma Mar S.A.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Pharma Mar S.A. is currently managing 4 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct art units, showing a focused but multi-faceted approach to life sciences. The portfolio involves 4 distinct examiners, with each of the 4 pending office actions assigned to a different individual.

CUNNINGCHEN, KATHLEEN MARY is the busiest examiner, though they only hold 1 pending office action. Since each of the 4 distinct examiners manages exactly 1 of the 4 pending office actions, the workload is evenly spread. This distribution across 3 distinct art units requires the company to manage 4 separate prosecution tracks, each with its own examiner-specific nuances. CUNNINGCHEN, KATHLEEN MARY is one of the 4 distinct examiners involved.

The presence of 3 distinct art units indicates that the company's Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals filings are being evaluated by multiple administrative groups. With 4 distinct examiners providing feedback, the company must be prepared for a variety of prosecution styles. This decentralized structure for the 4 pending office actions ensures that the portfolio's progress is not dependent on the review of any single individual.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
1
Medium (25%)
2
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only2 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CUNNINGCHEN, KATHLEEN MARY 1 61.1% +62.5%
TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH 1 25.5% +49.1%
ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL 1 59.2% +42.1%
HA, JULIE 1 75.7% +44.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17908532 COMPOUNDS FOR USE IN AUTOIMMUNE CONDITIONS HA, JULIE 58d overdue
18560991 DOSAGE REGIMENS FOR ECUBECTEDIN TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH 14d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17908532 COMPOUNDS FOR USE IN AUTOIMMUNE CONDITIONS HA, JULIE 58d overdue
18560991 DOSAGE REGIMENS FOR ECUBECTEDIN TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH 14d
17920000 DRUG ANTIBODY CONJUGATES ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL 35d
18703491 LURBINECTEDIN AND ATEZOLIZUMAB COMBINATIONS CUNNINGCHEN, KATHLEEN MARY —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1629 1
1627 1
1654 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18703491 LURBINECTEDIN AND ATEZOLIZUMAB COMBINATIONS CUNNINGCHEN, KATHLEEN MARY — §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 22, 2024
18560991 DOSAGE REGIMENS FOR ECUBECTEDIN TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH 1629 §112 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Nov 15, 2023
17920000 DRUG ANTIBODY CONJUGATES ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL 1627 §112 Final Rejection 35d Pending Oct 19, 2022
17908532 COMPOUNDS FOR USE IN AUTOIMMUNE CONDITIONS HA, JULIE 1654 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 58d overdue Pending Aug 31, 2022

Managing Pharma Mar S.A.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month