Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Pharmavision LLC operates a patent portfolio in the Communications technology area. The data shows 1 pending office action currently active for the company. This action is situated within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a narrow technical focus for the current pending matters. This concentration suggests that the company's immediate intellectual property goals are tied to a specific sub-sector of the communications field.
The prosecution is handled by a distinct examiner, POLO, GUSTAVO D. As the busiest examiner for the portfolio, POLO, GUSTAVO D is responsible for the pending office action. This indicates that the company's current interactions with the patent office are centralized under a specific individual and a specific art unit. There is no diversification of examiners at this stage of the portfolio's development.
For a portfolio in the Communications sector, having a pending office action with a distinct examiner suggests a very specific prosecution phase. The outcome of the company's current efforts depends entirely on the review process conducted by the assigned examiner within the designated art unit. Practitioners must focus their advocacy on the specific requirements and historical patterns of POLO, GUSTAVO D to successfully navigate the active case within the Communications technology area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| POLO, GUSTAVO D | 1 | 84.8% | +12.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18973676 | INTERACTIVE OBJECT DISPLAYING STRUCTURES AND METHODS OF USE | POLO, GUSTAVO D | 42d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18973676 | INTERACTIVE OBJECT DISPLAYING STRUCTURES AND METHODS OF USE | POLO, GUSTAVO D | 42d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2622 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18973676 | INTERACTIVE OBJECT DISPLAYING STRUCTURES AND METHODS OF USE | POLO, GUSTAVO D | 2622 | §103 | Final Rejection | 42d overdue | Pending | Dec 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial