Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Phc Corporation

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (25%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
No statute on record1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI T 1 75.0% +13.2%
REDDIG, PETER J 1 58.0% +40.0%
LE, AUSTIN Q 1 47.7% +33.6%
GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY 1 67.6% +54.3%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17594343 TRANSPORT MECHANISM AND ANALYZING DEVICE LE, AUSTIN Q 51d overdue
18261155 METHOD FOR PREDICTING RISK FOR THROMBOSIS IN CANCER PATIENT USING SOLUBLE CLEC2 REDDIG, PETER J 15d overdue
18479603 MEDICINE SUPPLYING APPARATUS OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI T 9d
17283769 ANALYZER GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY 22d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3651 1
1646 1
1796 1
1798 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18479603 MEDICINE SUPPLYING APPARATUS OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI T 3651 §103 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Oct 02, 2023
18261155 METHOD FOR PREDICTING RISK FOR THROMBOSIS IN CANCER PATIENT USING SOLUBLE CLEC2 REDDIG, PETER J 1646 Other Non-Final OA 15d overdue Pending Jul 12, 2023
17594343 TRANSPORT MECHANISM AND ANALYZING DEVICE LE, AUSTIN Q 1796 §103 Final Rejection 51d overdue Pending Oct 12, 2021
17283769 ANALYZER GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY 1798 §103 Final Rejection 22d Pending Apr 08, 2021

Managing Phc Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month