Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Planisware SAS

Technology area: Computing & Software

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Planisware SAS is currently addressing 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. The company's prosecution activity is restricted to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a focused approach to its current patent applications within the USPTO, with no active matters distributed across other software-related examination groups. The single distinct art unit suggests that the company's technology falls into a specific niche within the computing field that is handled by a specialized group of examiners at the patent office.

SAMARA, HUSAM TURKI is the busiest examiner, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since the portfolio only involves a single distinct examiner and art unit, the prosecution experience is tied to the review of this individual. The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the active workload for Planisware SAS in this technology area. Consequently, the company's immediate patent prospects are dependent on the outcome of the pending office action and the specific requirements set by SAMARA, HUSAM TURKI during the examination process. This singular focus means that every response submitted to the patent office carries significant weight for the company's overall portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SAMARA, HUSAM TURKI 1 55.7% +17.6%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16414732 ENHANCED MECHANISMS FOR PREDICTIVE ESTIMATION IN AN ENTERPRISE ENVIRONMENT SAMARA, HUSAM TURKI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2161 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
16414732 ENHANCED MECHANISMS FOR PREDICTIVE ESTIMATION IN AN ENTERPRISE ENVIRONMENT SAMARA, HUSAM TURKI 2161 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 16, 2019

Managing Planisware SAS's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month