Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Plastic Innovation GmbH has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This structure indicates a highly concentrated prosecution effort where a single reviewer in one specialized group is evaluating the company's current application.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is ROY, DEBJANI. This examiner is currently managing the 1 pending office action. Because the active portfolio consists of only this single matter, the prosecution strategy is entirely focused on the specific feedback and requirements of this individual examiner. This allows for a streamlined approach to the current workload.
The 1 distinct art unit involved suggests a specific technical focus within the Chemistry & Materials sector. The 1 pending office action assigned to ROY, DEBJANI represents the total current activity for the company at the patent office. Practitioners should monitor the specific tendencies of this examiner within the identified art unit to resolve the pending matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROY, DEBJANI | 1 | 75.8% | +15.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18723778 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A FORK FOR A TWO-WHEELED VEHICLE | ROY, DEBJANI | 33d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1741 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18723778 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A FORK FOR A TWO-WHEELED VEHICLE | ROY, DEBJANI | 1741 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 33d | Pending | Jun 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial