Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Plug P2P Inc. maintains a patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company has 1 pending office action currently. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very focused prosecution effort on a specific area of medical or mechanical technology.
STAUBACH, CARL C is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the company's total pending office actions count is 1, this examiner is responsible for the entire active docket. The presence of 1 distinct art unit means that the company's current patenting activity is confined to one specialized group at the patent office. Practitioners should focus their efforts on this 1 examiner, as the success of the company's current pending application depends entirely on this individual's review within their specific art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAUBACH, CARL C | 1 | 73.5% | +20.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18914256 | DECENTRALIZED NETWORK FOR PREDICTIVE SELECTION OF EV CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE | STAUBACH, CARL C | 71d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18914256 | DECENTRALIZED NETWORK FOR PREDICTIVE SELECTION OF EV CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE | STAUBACH, CARL C | 71d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3747 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18914256 | DECENTRALIZED NETWORK FOR PREDICTIVE SELECTION OF EV CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE | STAUBACH, CARL C | 3747 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 71d | Pending | Oct 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial