Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Powerlattice Technologies Inc. currently has 1 pending office action. This single matter is assigned to 1 examiner, FATIMA, AYMAN. The data shows that there are 0 distinct art units associated with this matter, which is an unusual administrative state.
The busiest examiner, FATIMA, AYMAN, is responsible for the 1 pending office action, representing the entirety of the company's current pending workload. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution effort is highly concentrated. The parity between the pending workload and the single official means that the company's success at the patent office is currently tied to this one interaction.
Practitioners should focus on the specific feedback from the examiner to resolve the outstanding matter. The absence of a recorded art unit for this case may require additional clarification during the prosecution process. This singular focus allows for a very dedicated approach, despite the lack of broader context from other examiners or art units. Without a designated art unit, the practitioner must rely heavily on direct communication with FATIMA, AYMAN to understand the applicable standards. This unique profile requires a flexible strategy to navigate the atypical absence of 0 distinct art units while maintaining progress on the single pending case.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FATIMA, AYMAN | 1 | 80.6% | +12.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19213294 | Methods and Devices for Emulating Load Circuits having Dynamic Current Profiles | FATIMA, AYMAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19213294 | Methods and Devices for Emulating Load Circuits having Dynamic Current Profiles | FATIMA, AYMAN | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19213294 | Methods and Devices for Emulating Load Circuits having Dynamic Current Profiles | FATIMA, AYMAN | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 20, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialPowerlattice Technologies Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 0 art units and 1 examiners.
Ayman Fatima has the most, with 1 of Powerlattice Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.