Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Precision Additive Solutions Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Precision Additive Solutions Inc. is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, meaning the company's current prosecution efforts are focused on a single interaction. The data shows 1 distinct art unit, which indicates that the active matter is being reviewed by a specific medical or mechanical engineering division. This streamlined profile suggests a highly targeted approach to their current intellectual property filings in the medical device sector.

BURNS, KRISTINA BABINSKI is the busiest examiner for the company, overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since BURNS, KRISTINA BABINSKI is the only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate success in the patent office depends entirely on this one review. For the practitioner, this means that the entire active portfolio is subject to the specific examination style of BURNS, KRISTINA BABINSKI, with no other pending actions to mitigate the risk of a rejection. The outcome of this 1 pending office action within the 1 distinct art unit will be the sole determinant of the portfolio's growth in the near term.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BURNS, KRISTINA BABINSKI 1 70.3% +31.7%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19085278 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS AND METHODS BURNS, KRISTINA BABINSKI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3761 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19085278 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS AND METHODS BURNS, KRISTINA BABINSKI 3761 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 20, 2025

Managing Precision Additive Solutions Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month