Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Premo Inc. manages a company patent portfolio in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The portfolio currently has 2 pending office actions. This count indicates the current volume of active prosecution files for the company.
The prosecution is spread across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, each active file is being reviewed in a separate administrative environment. This requires a prosecution strategy that can adapt to different technical standards across the 2 distinct art units.
ZAYKOVA-FELDMAN, LYUDMILA is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner handles 1 of the 2 pending office actions currently active. To advance the portfolio, the company must successfully navigate the requirements of 2 distinct art units and the specific examination styles of the 2 distinct examiners involved.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZAYKOVA-FELDMAN, LYUDMILA | 1 | 68.2% | +24.7% |
| STARKS, WILBERT L | 1 | 74.7% | +3.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17376009 | DISCRIMINATION APPARATUS, DISCRIMINATION METHOD AND LEARNING APPARATUS | STARKS, WILBERT L | 34d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18183076 | SENSOR DEVICE FOR DERIVING SITUATION VALUES FROM SENSOR MESASUREMENTS | ZAYKOVA-FELDMAN, LYUDMILA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2857 | 1 |
| 2122 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18183076 | SENSOR DEVICE FOR DERIVING SITUATION VALUES FROM SENSOR MESASUREMENTS | ZAYKOVA-FELDMAN, LYUDMILA | 2857 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 13, 2023 |
| 17376009 | DISCRIMINATION APPARATUS, DISCRIMINATION METHOD AND LEARNING APPARATUS | STARKS, WILBERT L | 2122 | §101 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Jul 14, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial