Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Prime Datum Development Company LLC is managing 2 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. Both of these actions are concentrated in 1 distinct art unit, yet they are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners. This concentration in a single art unit suggests that the company's technology is specialized within a specific chemical field. The busiest examiner, JOHNSON, ERIC, is responsible for 1 pending action, showing an even distribution of work.
The involvement of 2 distinct examiners within 1 distinct art unit means that the company will receive two different perspectives from the same department. Practitioners can benefit from this by comparing the feedback from each examiner to identify common themes or conflicting requirements within that art unit. However, the relationship of pending actions to examiners means no single official can resolve more than one matter.
With 2 pending office actions, the company must maintain a consistent technical narrative across all filings to ensure success in the 1 distinct art unit. The fact that JOHNSON, ERIC and the other examiner each have only 1 pending action prevents any consolidation of the prosecution effort. This structure requires a coordinated approach to handle the 2 distinct examiners simultaneously.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON, ERIC | 1 | 62.3% | +22.7% |
| BUSHEY, CHARLES S | 1 | 75.5% | +22.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18961139 | POWER DENSE MOTOR WITH THERMAL MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY | JOHNSON, ERIC | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16888681 | Load Bearing Direct Drive Fan System With Variable Process Control | BUSHEY, CHARLES S | 52d overdue |
| 18961139 | POWER DENSE MOTOR WITH THERMAL MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY | JOHNSON, ERIC | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1776 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18961139 | POWER DENSE MOTOR WITH THERMAL MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY | JOHNSON, ERIC | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 26, 2024 |
| 16888681 | Load Bearing Direct Drive Fan System With Variable Process Control | BUSHEY, CHARLES S | 1776 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 52d overdue | Pending | May 30, 2020 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial