Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Prostalund AB

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Prostalund AB operates within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area with 1 pending office action currently active. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, suggesting a focused approach to its current intellectual property filings. The portfolio is also contained within 1 distinct art unit, which indicates that the company's innovations fall under a specific technical classification. This concentration simplifies the prosecution process by requiring adherence to a single set of art unit standards. This focused strategy allows the company to concentrate its resources on a single active matter.

The busiest examiner for Prostalund AB is DARB, HAMZA A., who is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since this is the only pending action in the portfolio, DARB, HAMZA A. is the sole individual reviewing the company's current work at the USPTO. For practitioners, this means that the success of the current application is tied to the specific feedback and preferences of this examiner. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit reflects a streamlined prosecution strategy for the company's medical device technologies. Understanding the specific examination history of DARB, HAMZA A. is critical for navigating this single active matter.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DARB, HAMZA A. 1 74.4% +30.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18387511 KIT AND METHOD INTENDED FOR PROSTATE SURGERY DARB, HAMZA A. —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18387511 KIT AND METHOD INTENDED FOR PROSTATE SURGERY DARB, HAMZA A. 3783 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 07, 2023

Managing Prostalund AB's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month