Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 07, 2026

Purem GmbH

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
67% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHAN, KO HUNG 1 66.4% +15.3%
LUKS, JEREMY AUSTIN 1 73.6% +21.8%
BAIRD, CAMERON MICHAEL 1 100.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18320501 Fuel Cell Exhaust Gas Arrangement for a Fuel Cell System BAIRD, CAMERON MICHAEL 9d overdue
18913298 HOLDER FOR AN EXHAUST SYSTEM OF AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME CHAN, KO HUNG
18910924 MUFFLER LUKS, JEREMY AUSTIN

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18913298 HOLDER FOR AN EXHAUST SYSTEM OF AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME CHAN, KO HUNG
18910924 MUFFLER LUKS, JEREMY AUSTIN

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1728 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18913298 HOLDER FOR AN EXHAUST SYSTEM OF AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME CHAN, KO HUNG §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 11, 2024
18910924 MUFFLER LUKS, JEREMY AUSTIN §102§112 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 09, 2024
18320501 Fuel Cell Exhaust Gas Arrangement for a Fuel Cell System BAIRD, CAMERON MICHAEL 1728 §102§103 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending May 19, 2023

Managing Purem GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month