Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Pyrotek Inc.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 3 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Pyrotek Inc. currently has 5 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are being handled by 5 distinct examiners, which indicates that each pending matter is assigned to a different individual. This distribution suggests a lack of examiner concentration across the company's active prosecution files.

The company's applications are distributed across 3 distinct art units, reflecting a focused but multi-faceted technical scope within chemistry and materials. GILLENWATERS, JACKSON N is the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Because each of the 5 distinct examiners is only managing 1 pending office action, the company must navigate 5 separate examination styles. The 5 pending office actions are spread across 3 distinct art units, requiring the company to meet the specific technical requirements of these different groups during the prosecution of its materials-related innovations.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (17%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GILLENWATERS, JACKSON N 1 82.9% +12.7%
TRAN, LEN 1 14.9% +23.6%
HA, STEVEN S 1 70.2% +30.0%
STILES, JACOB BENJAMIN 1 0.0% +0.0%
SMOOT, MORIAH SIMONE MCMIL 1 63.9% +6.7%
PULLEN, NIKOLAS TAKUYA 1 52.5% +8.4%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18287946 SHAFT AND POST ASSEMBLIES FOR MOLTEN APPARATUS STILES, JACOB BENJAMIN 16d overdue
17908442 MECHANICAL AUGER RECIRCULATION WELL PULLEN, NIKOLAS TAKUYA 15d overdue
18838392 CASTING FURNACE HA, STEVEN S 20d
18881076 MOLTEN METAL IMPELLER WITH ROCK GUARD GILLENWATERS, JACKSON N —
18838976 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING ALUMINUM DEGASSING EFFICIENCY TRAN, LEN —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18838392 CASTING FURNACE HA, STEVEN S 20d
18881076 MOLTEN METAL IMPELLER WITH ROCK GUARD GILLENWATERS, JACKSON N —
18838976 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING ALUMINUM DEGASSING EFFICIENCY TRAN, LEN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1733 3
3745 1
1735 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18881076 MOLTEN METAL IMPELLER WITH ROCK GUARD GILLENWATERS, JACKSON N 3745 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 03, 2025
18838976 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING ALUMINUM DEGASSING EFFICIENCY TRAN, LEN — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 15, 2024
18838392 CASTING FURNACE HA, STEVEN S 1735 §103§112 Non-Final OA 20d Pending Aug 14, 2024
18287946 SHAFT AND POST ASSEMBLIES FOR MOLTEN APPARATUS STILES, JACOB BENJAMIN 1733 §103§112 Non-Final OA 16d overdue Pending Oct 23, 2023
18202395 FILTER HANDLING TOOL SMOOT, MORIAH SIMONE MCMIL 1733 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 26, 2023
17908442 MECHANICAL AUGER RECIRCULATION WELL PULLEN, NIKOLAS TAKUYA 1733 §103§112 Final Rejection 15d overdue Pending Aug 31, 2022

Managing Pyrotek Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month