Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Qsc LLC maintains a patent portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area with 3 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, creating an equal distribution between pending matters and examiners. The workload spans 2 distinct art units, which indicates that the company's software-related innovations are being evaluated across different specialized groups within the patent office.
ASSAD MOHAMMED is the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Given that the total pending office actions count is 3, the busiest examiner pending count of 1 shows that the workload is spread across the 3 distinct examiners. This distribution suggests that no single examiner holds a majority of the company's active cases.
The involvement of 2 distinct art units for the pending office actions implies some overlap in the technical classification of the applications. Practitioners can observe that with the 3 distinct examiners involved, the company must manage separate prosecution timelines simultaneously. This diversity in examination personnel within the Computing & Software sector requires a broad approach to addressing various examiner-specific preferences.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOHAMMED, ASSAD | 1 | 73.4% | +11.8% |
| WILLIS, AMANDA LYNN | 1 | 35.8% | +26.3% |
| BOURZIK, BRAHIM | 1 | 63.8% | +44.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18913717 | CLOUD-BASED DIGITAL TWIN AND VIRTUAL DEVICE SYSTEM FOR EFFICIENT AUDIO, VIDEO, AND CONTROL SYSTEM AND DEVICE MANAGEMENT AND TESTING | WILLIS, AMANDA LYNN | 92d overdue |
| 19083356 | CONFERENCING SYSTEM WITH INTELLIGENT CALIBRATION | MOHAMMED, ASSAD | — |
| 18731235 | SERVER SUPPORT FOR MULTIPLE AUDIO/VIDEO OPERATING SYSTEMS | BOURZIK, BRAHIM | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2156 | 1 |
| 2191 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19083356 | CONFERENCING SYSTEM WITH INTELLIGENT CALIBRATION | MOHAMMED, ASSAD | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 18, 2025 |
| 18913717 | CLOUD-BASED DIGITAL TWIN AND VIRTUAL DEVICE SYSTEM FOR EFFICIENT AUDIO, VIDEO, AND CONTROL SYSTEM AND DEVICE MANAGEMENT AND TESTING | WILLIS, AMANDA LYNN | 2156 | §103 | Final Rejection | 92d overdue | Pending | Oct 11, 2024 |
| 18731235 | SERVER SUPPORT FOR MULTIPLE AUDIO/VIDEO OPERATING SYSTEMS | BOURZIK, BRAHIM | 2191 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial