Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Queen'S University AT Kingston

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (67%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
§102 only1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BLAISE, BRADFORD CHRISTOPHER 1 59.7% +34.1%
WINAKUR, ERIC FRANK 1 79.0% +14.0%
EPPERT, LUCY CLARE 1 52.9% +55.7%

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18561400 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING BRAIN DISORDERS WINAKUR, ERIC FRANK 46d overdue
18660720 Adhesive Wearable Sensors for Measuring Bioelectrical Signals BLAISE, BRADFORD CHRISTOPHER 21d
18029260 Method and Apparatus for Generating an Electrocardiogram from a Photoplethysmogram EPPERT, LUCY CLARE 30d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 2
3794 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18660720 Adhesive Wearable Sensors for Measuring Bioelectrical Signals BLAISE, BRADFORD CHRISTOPHER 3794 §103 Non-Final OA 21d Pending May 10, 2024
18561400 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING BRAIN DISORDERS WINAKUR, ERIC FRANK 3791 §102 Non-Final OA 46d overdue Pending Nov 16, 2023
18029260 Method and Apparatus for Generating an Electrocardiogram from a Photoplethysmogram EPPERT, LUCY CLARE 3791 §112 Final Rejection 30d Pending Mar 29, 2023

Managing Queen'S University AT Kingston's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month