Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Qwiti Holdings Ii LLC has 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. The narrow scope of the current pending portfolio indicates a specific focus on software-related intellectual property. This arrangement of 1 action, 1 examiner, and 1 art unit suggests a highly targeted approach to the company's current patent filings at the USPTO.
The busiest examiner for this company is SANA, MOHAMMAD AZAM, who is overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action. As the only examiner currently active for the company, their individual examination style will be critical to the outcome of the pending matter. The presence of only 1 art unit suggests that the company's current software innovations fall into a single technical classification. Practitioners should monitor this examiner's history within the specified 1 art unit to optimize their prosecution strategy. This singular focus allows for a direct and simplified communication path during the examination process.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SANA, MOHAMMAD AZAM | 1 | 86.3% | +20.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18922950 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONSENSUS IN A BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK | SANA, MOHAMMAD AZAM | 63d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18922950 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONSENSUS IN A BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK | SANA, MOHAMMAD AZAM | 63d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2166 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18922950 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONSENSUS IN A BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK | SANA, MOHAMMAD AZAM | 2166 | §101§103Other | Final Rejection | 63d | Pending | Oct 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial