Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Radexel Inc. currently has 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners and are located within 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner is GABR, MOHAMED GAMIL, who is responsible for 1 pending office action.
The 2 pending office actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner handles a single action. Both examiners operate within the same 1 distinct art unit. This allows for a consistent art unit environment even as the practitioner interacts with different individuals. The concentration in one art unit suggests that the technical subject matter is closely related.
Managing these 2 pending office actions requires attention to the specific preferences of GABR, MOHAMED GAMIL and the other assigned examiner. Because the work is contained in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area, the practitioner can leverage art unit specific knowledge across both matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GABR, MOHAMED GAMIL | 1 | 80.5% | +21.9% |
| KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE | 1 | 84.4% | +23.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18948170 | DEVICE FOR GENERATING MAGNETIC FIELD AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SAME | GABR, MOHAMED GAMIL | 5d overdue |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18762975 | ELECTRON PENCIL BEAM-BASED MAGNETIC ADJUSTMENT ELECTRON RAY TREATMENT APPARATUS AND SYSTEM | KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18948170 | DEVICE FOR GENERATING MAGNETIC FIELD AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SAME | GABR, MOHAMED GAMIL | 5d overdue |
| 18762975 | ELECTRON PENCIL BEAM-BASED MAGNETIC ADJUSTMENT ELECTRON RAY TREATMENT APPARATUS AND SYSTEM | KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3771 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18948170 | DEVICE FOR GENERATING MAGNETIC FIELD AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SAME | GABR, MOHAMED GAMIL | 3771 | §103 | Final Rejection | 5d overdue | Pending | Nov 14, 2024 |
| 18762975 | ELECTRON PENCIL BEAM-BASED MAGNETIC ADJUSTMENT ELECTRON RAY TREATMENT APPARATUS AND SYSTEM | KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial