Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days
Radiant Opto-Electronics Corporation has 2 pending office actions in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics. These 2 actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners but are located within 1 distinct art unit. KRYUKOVA, ERIN is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests a specific technical focus for the company's optical innovations, even though the office has assigned two different individuals to review the cases.
The use of 2 distinct examiners for 2 actions means that the company must manage two different prosecution styles within the same technical classification. This requires a strategy that maintains technical consistency across the art unit while adapting to the individual preferences of each examiner. Because each examiner only handles 1 pending office action, no single person has a dominant influence over the portfolio. Practitioners should focus on the specific standards of the single art unit while being prepared for the unique perspectives of 2 different examiners. This profile reflects a technically focused but personnel-diverse prosecution landscape for the company's current 2 pending office actions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KRYUKOVA, ERIN | 1 | 64.3% | +29.0% |
| CARRUTH, JENNIFER DOAK | 1 | 77.3% | +15.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18912586 | OPTICAL COMPONENT, FRONT LIGHT MODULE AND REFLECTIVE DISPLAY | CARRUTH, JENNIFER DOAK | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19349012 | BACKLIGHT MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICE | KRYUKOVA, ERIN | — |
| 18912586 | OPTICAL COMPONENT, FRONT LIGHT MODULE AND REFLECTIVE DISPLAY | CARRUTH, JENNIFER DOAK | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2875 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19349012 | BACKLIGHT MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICE | KRYUKOVA, ERIN | 2875 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 03, 2025 |
| 18912586 | OPTICAL COMPONENT, FRONT LIGHT MODULE AND REFLECTIVE DISPLAY | CARRUTH, JENNIFER DOAK | — | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial