Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Radiation Monitoring Devices Inc. has 3 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These matters are assigned to 3 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units, showing a slight concentration of organizational oversight despite the individual examiner variety. Because the filings are spread across only 2 distinct art units, at least some of the examiners are likely working within the same unit, which may provide some consistency in the underlying examination policies applied to the portfolio.
BRYANT, MICHAEL CASEY is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Because each of the filings is handled by a different individual, the portfolio lacks a primary point of contact at the examiner level. Practitioners should prepare for unique preferences across the distinct examiners involved. The presence of these examiners means that no single person's history will dominate the current prosecution experience. However, the 2 distinct art units suggest that the subject matter is focused enough to stay within a limited number of administrative groups.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRYANT, MICHAEL CASEY | 1 | 78.5% | +16.9% |
| EDMONDSON, LYNNE RENEE | 1 | 71.3% | +15.9% |
| GUNBERG, EDWIN C | 1 | 78.0% | +6.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18974423 | SCINTILLATOR MATERIALS COMPRISING LITHIUM, AN ALKALINE EARTH METAL, AND A HALIDE | BRYANT, MICHAEL CASEY | — |
| 17880203 | HALIDE-BASED SCINTILLATOR MATERIALS | EDMONDSON, LYNNE RENEE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18974423 | SCINTILLATOR MATERIALS COMPRISING LITHIUM, AN ALKALINE EARTH METAL, AND A HALIDE | BRYANT, MICHAEL CASEY | — |
| 17880203 | HALIDE-BASED SCINTILLATOR MATERIALS | EDMONDSON, LYNNE RENEE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2884 | 2 |
| 1734 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18974423 | SCINTILLATOR MATERIALS COMPRISING LITHIUM, AN ALKALINE EARTH METAL, AND A HALIDE | BRYANT, MICHAEL CASEY | 2884 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 09, 2024 |
| 17880203 | HALIDE-BASED SCINTILLATOR MATERIALS | EDMONDSON, LYNNE RENEE | 1734 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 03, 2022 |
| 17703941 | ORGANIC GLASS SCINTILLATORS | GUNBERG, EDWIN C | 2884 | §102 | Final Rejection | 93d overdue | Pending | Mar 24, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial