Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Raumaster Paper OY is focused on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company has 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a singular point of contact at the patent office. This concentration allows the company to dedicate its legal resources to a single examination process rather than managing multiple simultaneous reviews.
The prosecution is occurring in 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the mechanical innovations are being reviewed within a specific technical group. Practitioners can tailor their approach to the specific standards of this 1 unit. Understanding the specific internal policies of the department is critical for success in moving the application toward allowance.
The busiest examiner is SINGH, KAVEL. This examiner is responsible for the pending office action. With a busiest examiner pending count of 1, this individual is the only examiner currently reviewing the company's pending work. The outcome of the current prosecution depends entirely on this specific interaction. Practitioners should analyze the historical patterns of the examiner to prepare an effective response.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SINGH, KAVEL | 1 | 83.7% | +14.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19231071 | DRIVE UNIT, CHAIN CONVEYOR AND METHOD | SINGH, KAVEL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19231071 | DRIVE UNIT, CHAIN CONVEYOR AND METHOD | SINGH, KAVEL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3651 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19231071 | DRIVE UNIT, CHAIN CONVEYOR AND METHOD | SINGH, KAVEL | 3651 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 06, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialRaumaster Paper OY has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Kavel Singh has the most, with 1 of Raumaster Paper OY's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
