Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Raymarine UK Limited

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Raymarine UK Limited is managing 4 pending office actions. These actions are within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company's matters are handled by 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. Davin Seol is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 3 pending actions.

This means that Davin Seol is responsible for the vast majority of the company's 4 pending office actions. The distribution across 2 distinct art units suggests that the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology is being reviewed by two different examination groups. Practitioners should focus heavily on the preferences of Davin Seol, given their 3 pending actions. The involvement of only 2 distinct examiners for 4 pending office actions indicates a high concentration of the workload. This can lead to more consistent outcomes if the relationship with the examiners is positive. However, it also means that the company's current prosecution success is largely dependent on the decisions of just 2 distinct examiners. Managing these 4 pending office actions requires a targeted approach within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SEOL, DAVIN 3 67.0% +15.2%
BEDEWI, RAMI NABIH 1 67.5% +27.6%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18906119 DYNAMIC PROXIMITY ALERT SYSTEMS AND METHODS BEDEWI, RAMI NABIH 14d
18439717 AUTONOMOUS AND ASSISTED DOCKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS SEOL, DAVIN 23d
19031242 AUTONOMOUS AND ASSISTED DOCKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS SEOL, DAVIN —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18906119 DYNAMIC PROXIMITY ALERT SYSTEMS AND METHODS BEDEWI, RAMI NABIH 14d
18439717 AUTONOMOUS AND ASSISTED DOCKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS SEOL, DAVIN 23d
19031263 COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS AND METHODS SEOL, DAVIN —
19031242 AUTONOMOUS AND ASSISTED DOCKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS SEOL, DAVIN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3662 3
3666 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19031263 COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS AND METHODS SEOL, DAVIN 3662 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
19031242 AUTONOMOUS AND ASSISTED DOCKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS SEOL, DAVIN 3662 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18906119 DYNAMIC PROXIMITY ALERT SYSTEMS AND METHODS BEDEWI, RAMI NABIH 3666 §101§103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Oct 03, 2024
18439717 AUTONOMOUS AND ASSISTED DOCKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS SEOL, DAVIN 3662 §103§112Other Final Rejection 23d Pending Feb 12, 2024

Managing Raymarine UK Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month