Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Renosac Corporation currently manages 1 pending office action within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This specific matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, CHEN, JACK S J, who also serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution activity is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused technical scope for the company patent portfolio.
Practitioners should note that with 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the current prosecution strategy is highly centralized. Because the busiest examiner handles the 1 busiest examiner pending matter, the outcome of this specific interaction will dictate the immediate progress of the company intellectual property. The reliance on 1 distinct art unit suggests that the pending application falls within a specialized regulatory or examination group within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector.
This singular focus allows the legal team to concentrate their resources on the specific examination style of CHEN, JACK S J. However, the lack of diversity in examiners or art units means that any procedural delays will affect the entire active portfolio. Navigating the active matter requires a precise response tailored to the technical standards of the assigned art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHEN, JACK S J | 1 | 76.7% | +5.6% |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2893 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17879118 | SiC EPITAXIAL WAFER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SiC EPITAXIAL WAFER | CHEN, JACK S J | 2893 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Aug 02, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial