Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Repiper AB is currently navigating the patent process within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio contains 1 pending office action, which is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. This singular focus indicates that the applicant's current efforts are concentrated on a specific set of claims or a single application. GAY, JENNIFER HAWKINS is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, as she is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently active.
The examination is taking place within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the technical subject matter is specialized enough to fall under a single administrative group at the patent office. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution path is streamlined but lacks the variety of perspectives found in larger portfolios. The 1 pending office action handled by GAY, JENNIFER HAWKINS will be the determining factor for the portfolio's progress in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. This centralized structure requires a precise response to the 1 pending office action to ensure successful allowance.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GAY, JENNIFER HAWKINS | 1 | 85.1% | +8.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18561117 | LINER ARRANGEMENT FOR INSERTING IN A PIPE STRUCTURE, AND METHOD FOR RELINING A PIPE STRUCTURE | GAY, JENNIFER HAWKINS | 15d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3619 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18561117 | LINER ARRANGEMENT FOR INSERTING IN A PIPE STRUCTURE, AND METHOD FOR RELINING A PIPE STRUCTURE | GAY, JENNIFER HAWKINS | 3619 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 15d overdue | Pending | Nov 15, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial