Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Revbio Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 6 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Revbio Inc. currently manages 7 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This volume of prosecution is distributed among 7 distinct examiners, indicating a broad engagement across the examining corps. These actions are spread across 6 distinct art units, suggesting a variety of technical focuses within the medical and mechanical fields.

RAMANA, ANURADHA is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. While the total number of pending office actions is 7, the workload is highly distributed, as evidenced by the fact that the busiest examiner only accounts for 1 pending office action. This distribution across 6 distinct art units may require the company to navigate varying examination standards and timelines. The presence of 7 distinct examiners for 7 actions ensures that no single examiner is managing multiple matters for the company. Revbio Inc. must coordinate its 7 pending office actions across these 6 distinct art units.

For a patent practitioner, the lack of examiner concentration means that each application requires a unique approach tailored to its specific examiner. However, the concentration in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area provides some thematic consistency. The 7 distinct examiners will each provide independent evaluations, requiring the company to maintain a robust and flexible prosecution strategy. Successfully managing 7 pending office actions across 6 distinct art units is a significant administrative task.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
3
Medium (43%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only2 (29%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
29% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RAMANA, ANURADHA 1 82.7% +22.4%
WOODALL, NICHOLAS W 1 82.0% +13.3%
BATES, DAVID W 1 76.4% +16.7%
ROSEN, ERIC J 1 41.3% +22.8%
BECKHARDT, LYNDSEY MARIE 1 27.8% +48.0%
CARROLL, JEREMY W 1 74.8% +12.3%
PIPIC, ALMA 1 54.6% +54.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18283642 IMAGE GUIDED DELIVERY OF COMPOSITIONS AND RELATED METHODS WOODALL, NICHOLAS W —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17639221 FORMULATION AND PACKAGING OF COMPOSITIONS CARROLL, JEREMY W 260d overdue
17774409 ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING THERAPEUTICS BECKHARDT, LYNDSEY MARIE 104d overdue
16069826 DEVICES AND COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF PIPIC, ALMA 1d overdue
18717801 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR BONE FIXATION RAMANA, ANURADHA —
17847894 IMPLANTABLE OBJECTS, GUIDING DEVICES, AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF ROSEN, ERIC J —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17639221 FORMULATION AND PACKAGING OF COMPOSITIONS CARROLL, JEREMY W 260d overdue
17774409 ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING THERAPEUTICS BECKHARDT, LYNDSEY MARIE 104d overdue
18010603 BONE FLAP FIXATION DEVICE BATES, DAVID W 45d overdue
16069826 DEVICES AND COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF PIPIC, ALMA 1d overdue
18717801 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR BONE FIXATION RAMANA, ANURADHA —
18283642 IMAGE GUIDED DELIVERY OF COMPOSITIONS AND RELATED METHODS WOODALL, NICHOLAS W —
17847894 IMPLANTABLE OBJECTS, GUIDING DEVICES, AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF ROSEN, ERIC J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3775 2
3799 1
3772 1
1613 1
3754 1
1617 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18717801 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR BONE FIXATION RAMANA, ANURADHA 3775 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 07, 2024
18283642 IMAGE GUIDED DELIVERY OF COMPOSITIONS AND RELATED METHODS WOODALL, NICHOLAS W 3775 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 22, 2023
18010603 BONE FLAP FIXATION DEVICE BATES, DAVID W 3799 §103 Non-Final OA 45d overdue Pending Dec 15, 2022
17847894 IMPLANTABLE OBJECTS, GUIDING DEVICES, AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF ROSEN, ERIC J 3772 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 23, 2022
17774409 ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING THERAPEUTICS BECKHARDT, LYNDSEY MARIE 1613 §103DP Non-Final OA 104d overdue Pending May 04, 2022
17639221 FORMULATION AND PACKAGING OF COMPOSITIONS CARROLL, JEREMY W 3754 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 260d overdue Pending Feb 28, 2022
16069826 DEVICES AND COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF PIPIC, ALMA 1617 §103§112 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Jul 12, 2018

Managing Revbio Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month