Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ribbit Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This activity is confined to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. Such a concentrated profile suggests that the company's current patenting efforts are focused on a specific technical advancement within the software field. The limited number of active matters indicates a streamlined prosecution phase for the company's current applications.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is TRAN, DANIEL DUC, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This examiner handles the 1 pending office action for the company. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the company's immediate patenting goals are entirely dependent on the outcome of this single review. The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit further emphasizes the specialized nature of the pending application. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination trends of this art unit to anticipate potential hurdles. The lack of multiple examiners means there is no opportunity to compare different examination styles within the company's current portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRAN, DANIEL DUC | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18321373 | MACHINE LEARNING-BASED GRAPH ANALYTICS FOR USER EVALUATION | TRAN, DANIEL DUC | 33d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2147 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18321373 | MACHINE LEARNING-BASED GRAPH ANALYTICS FOR USER EVALUATION | TRAN, DANIEL DUC | 2147 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | 33d | Pending | May 22, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial