Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Rohto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

7 pending office actions • 4 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Rohto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. currently manages 7 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This workload is distributed across 7 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units. The distribution of pending actions to examiners suggests a broad spread of active matters rather than concentration under a specific individual. Practitioners should prepare for varied examination styles across the 4 involved art units, as the portfolio is not centralized under a specific group.

ABBAS, ABDULRAHMAN MUSTAFA is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. Because the pending office actions are split among the distinct examiners, no examiner holds a disproportionate share of the company's current prosecution pipeline. This distribution indicates that the matters are being processed independently, which may lead to different timelines for resolution depending on the specific art unit and examiner involved.

The variety of examiners suggests that the company's legal team must adapt to multiple perspectives during the negotiation of patent claims. This decentralized structure may also imply that the underlying technologies are diverse enough to trigger assignments across several specialized groups within the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (14%)
6
Medium (86%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (71%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
86% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ABBAS, ABDULRAHMAN MUSTAFA 1 52.4% +34.8%
KRISHNAN, GANAPATHY 1 52.8% +1.1%
VIGIL, TORIANA NICHOLE 1 53.1% +24.1%
WELLES, COLMAN THOMAS 1 29.2% +64.2%
FAY, ZOHREH ALEMZADEH 1 52.2% -6.2%
MCCORMICK, CATHERINE LYNN 1 50.0% +42.5%
NOLAN, JASON MICHAEL 1 66.5% -27.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18018105 Aqueous Composition WELLES, COLMAN THOMAS 49d overdue
18703041 OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION KRISHNAN, GANAPATHY —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18018105 Aqueous Composition WELLES, COLMAN THOMAS 49d overdue
18695745 OPHTHALMOLOGICAL COMPOSITION VIGIL, TORIANA NICHOLE 22d overdue
18709382 OIL-BASED SOLID COMPOSITION FOR EXTERNAL USE ABBAS, ABDULRAHMAN MUSTAFA 39d
17918390 AGENT FOR INCREASING CD25-POSITIVE REGULATORY T CELLS IN KIDNEYS MCCORMICK, CATHERINE LYNN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1612 3
1617 1
1638 1
1623 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18709382 OIL-BASED SOLID COMPOSITION FOR EXTERNAL USE ABBAS, ABDULRAHMAN MUSTAFA 1612 §103 Final Rejection 39d Pending May 10, 2024
18703041 OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION KRISHNAN, GANAPATHY — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2024
18695745 OPHTHALMOLOGICAL COMPOSITION VIGIL, TORIANA NICHOLE 1612 §103 Final Rejection 22d overdue Pending Mar 26, 2024
18018105 Aqueous Composition WELLES, COLMAN THOMAS 1612 §103DP Non-Final OA 49d overdue Pending Jan 26, 2023
18018108 Aqueous Composition FAY, ZOHREH ALEMZADEH 1617 §103 Non-Final OA 24d overdue Pending Jan 26, 2023
17918390 AGENT FOR INCREASING CD25-POSITIVE REGULATORY T CELLS IN KIDNEYS MCCORMICK, CATHERINE LYNN 1638 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 12, 2022
17788378 Aqueous Composition NOLAN, JASON MICHAEL 1623 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 23, 2022

Managing Rohto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month