Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Runsignup Inc. currently has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, KIM, PATRICK. The prosecution is active in 1 distinct art unit. KIM, PATRICK is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. This single pending action constitutes the company's current prosecution profile, involving 1 distinct examiner in a single art unit.
Practitioners should tailor their strategy to the specific technical requirements of the 1 distinct art unit involved. The presence of 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action allows for a focused and consistent legal argument. Since the work is situated in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area, the examiner likely has a specialized understanding of the relevant technology. This structure facilitates direct communication and can lead to a more efficient resolution of the pending matter. The applicant's current efforts are concentrated on this single point of prosecution, requiring a precise response to the 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIM, PATRICK | 1 | 26.3% | +33.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18809238 | MULTIDAY TIMED ENTRY TICKET SYSTEM FOR RECURRING EVENTS | KIM, PATRICK | 252d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18809238 | MULTIDAY TIMED ENTRY TICKET SYSTEM FOR RECURRING EVENTS | KIM, PATRICK | 252d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18809238 | MULTIDAY TIMED ENTRY TICKET SYSTEM FOR RECURRING EVENTS | KIM, PATRICK | 3628 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 252d overdue | Pending | Aug 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial