Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sabanto Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sabanto Inc. currently manages 4 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This portfolio is distributed across 4 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units, indicating a fragmented prosecution landscape where each matter is handled by a different individual. Such a one to one ratio between actions and examiners suggests that the company does not currently benefit from examiner-specific institutional knowledge across multiple filings.

KUNTZ, JEWEL A is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, though they are only responsible for 1 pending office action. The fact that even the busiest examiner holds only 1 action reinforces the observation of a broad spread across the USPTO. Practitioners should prepare for diverse stylistic preferences and varying levels of examiner experience, as the 4 distinct art units likely involve different internal policies and examination standards. This distribution requires a versatile legal strategy that can adapt to the specific requirements of 4 separate art units simultaneously.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only3 (75%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KUNTZ, JEWEL A 1 70.8% +17.5%
LEVY, MERRITT E 1 31.7% +35.6%
ROBINSON, KITO R 1 62.3% +38.9%
IVEY, DANA DESHAWN 1 88.5% +6.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18343891 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED OPERATION OF A WORKING VEHICLE IVEY, DANA DESHAWN —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19285124 METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING PATH PLANNING FOR AGRICULTURAL VEHICLES KUNTZ, JEWEL A —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19285124 METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING PATH PLANNING FOR AGRICULTURAL VEHICLES KUNTZ, JEWEL A —
19225110 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED OPERATION OF A WORKING VEHICLE LEVY, MERRITT E —
18343843 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED OPERATION OF A WORKING VEHICLE ROBINSON, KITO R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3666 1
3663 1
3664 1
3662 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19285124 METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING PATH PLANNING FOR AGRICULTURAL VEHICLES KUNTZ, JEWEL A 3666 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 30, 2025
19225110 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED OPERATION OF A WORKING VEHICLE LEVY, MERRITT E 3663 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 02, 2025
18343843 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED OPERATION OF A WORKING VEHICLE ROBINSON, KITO R 3664 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 29, 2023
18343891 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED OPERATION OF A WORKING VEHICLE IVEY, DANA DESHAWN 3662 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 29, 2023

Managing Sabanto Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Sabanto Inc. have?

Sabanto Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Sabanto Inc. applications?

Jewel A Kuntz has the most, with 1 of Sabanto Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Sabanto Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month