Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Samet Kalip Ve Madeni Esya San Ve Tic A S

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

7 pending office actions • 1 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Samet Kalip Ve Madeni Esya San Ve Tic A S has 7 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The matters involve 6 examiners but only 1 art unit, indicating substantial examiner variation within one technical examination setting.

AYRES, TIMOTHY MICHAEL is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending office actions. Counsel can use the common art-unit context to compare examination positions, while coordinating the files assigned to the busiest examiner and preserving examiner-specific response analysis for the other matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
2
Medium (29%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only2 (29%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (71%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AYRES, TIMOTHY MICHAEL 2 59.3% +20.8%
ING, MATTHEW W 1 64.7% +8.4%
WILKENS, JANET MARIE 1 72.6% +12.6%
ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK 1 63.5% +24.2%
ROHRHOFF, DANIEL J 1 77.7% +15.2%
WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 1 70.3% +18.8%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19113238 Extension guide ING, MATTHEW W —
19107631 Extension guide WILKENS, JANET MARIE —
18871874 Device for ejecting a movable furniture part ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK —
18871911 Arrangement With Two Devices For Ejecting A Movable Furniture Part WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S —
18871879 Device for ejecting a movable furniture part AYRES, TIMOTHY MICHAEL —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19107631 Extension guide WILKENS, JANET MARIE —
18871874 Device for ejecting a movable furniture part ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK —
18871906 Device for ejecting a movable furniture part AYRES, TIMOTHY MICHAEL —
18871900 Device for ejecting a movable furniture part ROHRHOFF, DANIEL J —
18871911 Arrangement With Two Devices For Ejecting A Movable Furniture Part WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S —
18871879 Device for ejecting a movable furniture part AYRES, TIMOTHY MICHAEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3637 7

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19113238 Extension guide ING, MATTHEW W 3637 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 19, 2025
19107631 Extension guide WILKENS, JANET MARIE 3637 §102§112 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 28, 2025
18871874 Device for ejecting a movable furniture part ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK 3637 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18871906 Device for ejecting a movable furniture part AYRES, TIMOTHY MICHAEL 3637 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18871900 Device for ejecting a movable furniture part ROHRHOFF, DANIEL J 3637 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18871911 Arrangement With Two Devices For Ejecting A Movable Furniture Part WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 3637 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18871879 Device for ejecting a movable furniture part AYRES, TIMOTHY MICHAEL 3637 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024

Managing Samet Kalip Ve Madeni Esya San Ve Tic A S's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Samet Kalip Ve Madeni Esya San Ve Tic A S have?

Samet Kalip Ve Madeni Esya San Ve Tic A S has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 6 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Samet Kalip Ve Madeni Esya San Ve Tic A S applications?

Timothy Michael Ayres has the most, with 2 of Samet Kalip Ve Madeni Esya San Ve Tic A S's pending office actions.

What technology area are Samet Kalip Ve Madeni Esya San Ve Tic A S's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month