Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Saurer Spinning Solutions GmbH & Co. Kg

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Saurer Spinning Solutions GmbH & Co. Kg is managing 4 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These cases are assigned to 4 distinct examiners, indicating that each active matter is being reviewed by a different individual. This distribution requires the company to manage four separate examiner relationships simultaneously. These actions are further spread across 4 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's technology is highly diversified across different specialized subgroups within the mechanical engineering field.

HUANG, GRACE is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, though this individual is only responsible for 1 pending office action. This parity among the examiners means that no single person holds a majority of the active workload. For the practitioner, this diversity of examiners across multiple art units requires a highly adaptable prosecution strategy. The company must address the specific technical requirements of 4 distinct art units while also navigating the individual preferences of four different examiners. The 4 pending office actions represent a broad and varied engagement with the USPTO in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HUANG, GRACE 1 56.8% +55.2%
PATEL, JAY P 1 84.7% +5.4%
BURRELL, KATELYNNE RUTH 1 56.5% -0.4%
WALTERS, RYAN J 1 74.4% +29.1%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18557130 THREAD CLAMPING DEVICE WALTERS, RYAN J 51d overdue
18680314 TUBE MAGAZINE HUANG, GRACE 15d overdue
18625494 METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TRANSMISSION OF A NETWORK CONFIGURATION FOR ONE OR MORE TEXTILE MACHINES PATEL, JAY P 61d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18557130 THREAD CLAMPING DEVICE WALTERS, RYAN J 51d overdue
18680314 TUBE MAGAZINE HUANG, GRACE 15d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3732 1
2466 1
3654 1
3799 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18680314 TUBE MAGAZINE HUANG, GRACE 3732 §102§103 Non-Final OA 15d overdue Pending May 31, 2024
18625494 METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TRANSMISSION OF A NETWORK CONFIGURATION FOR ONE OR MORE TEXTILE MACHINES PATEL, JAY P 2466 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA 61d Pending Apr 03, 2024
18622898 THREAD TRAVERSING DEVICE, TEXTILE MACHINE AND METHOD BURRELL, KATELYNNE RUTH 3654 §102§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 30, 2024
18557130 THREAD CLAMPING DEVICE WALTERS, RYAN J 3799 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 51d overdue Pending Oct 25, 2023

Managing Saurer Spinning Solutions GmbH & Co. Kg's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month