Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Sbtl Advanced Materials Co. Ltd.

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DARBY, BRENDON CHARLES 1 49.6% +16.8%
ARCIERO, ADAM A 1 65.2% -18.1%
MCNULTY, SEAMUS PATRICK 1 45.0% +29.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18275039 ALUMINUM POUCH FILM FOR SECONDARY BATTERY, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR DARBY, BRENDON CHARLES

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18268064 ALUMINUM POUCH FILM FOR SECONDARY BATTERY MCNULTY, SEAMUS PATRICK 25d overdue
18275039 ALUMINUM POUCH FILM FOR SECONDARY BATTERY, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR DARBY, BRENDON CHARLES

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1749 1
1727 1
1752 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18275039 ALUMINUM POUCH FILM FOR SECONDARY BATTERY, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR DARBY, BRENDON CHARLES 1749 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 31, 2023
18274792 ALUMINUM POUCH FILM FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME ARCIERO, ADAM A 1727 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Jul 28, 2023
18268064 ALUMINUM POUCH FILM FOR SECONDARY BATTERY MCNULTY, SEAMUS PATRICK 1752 §103 Non-Final OA 25d overdue Pending Jun 16, 2023

Managing Sbtl Advanced Materials Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month