Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 2 (50%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHATNAGAR, ANAND P | 1 | 91.4% | +2.3% |
| LAVARIAS, ARNEL C | 1 | 79.7% | +0.3% |
| VU, PHU | 1 | 85.3% | +9.6% |
| SPENCER, ANDREA LYNNE MORRIS | 1 | 28.6% | +83.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18559473 | COVERSLIPPING METHOD | VU, PHU | 84d |
| 18833694 | MORPHOLOGY BASED VERIFIABLE SCREENING | BHATNAGAR, ANAND P | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18235922 | CAR THERAPY RESPONSE PREDICTION | SPENCER, ANDREA LYNNE MORRIS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18235922 | CAR THERAPY RESPONSE PREDICTION | SPENCER, ANDREA LYNNE MORRIS | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2668 | 1 |
| 2872 | 1 |
| 2871 | 1 |
| 1631 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18833694 | MORPHOLOGY BASED VERIFIABLE SCREENING | BHATNAGAR, ANAND P | 2668 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 26, 2024 |
| 18771065 | MULTI/PARALLEL SCANNER | LAVARIAS, ARNEL C | 2872 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 12, 2024 |
| 18559473 | COVERSLIPPING METHOD | VU, PHU | 2871 | §103 | Final Rejection | 84d | Pending | Nov 07, 2023 |
| 18235922 | CAR THERAPY RESPONSE PREDICTION | SPENCER, ANDREA LYNNE MORRIS | 1631 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 21, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial