Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Seedn Co. Ltd.

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Seedn Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, KHATIB, RAMI, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. The portfolio involves 0 distinct art units.

This represents a concentrated prosecution effort under a single examiner. With 1 pending action and 1 examiner, the portfolio's current interaction with the patent office is highly centralized. The presence of 0 distinct art units suggests the matter may not yet be assigned to a specific technical group. This examiner and the pending action represent the total current workload for the company. Practitioners should focus on addressing the specific requirements of KHATIB, RAMI to move the application forward. The lack of an assigned art unit may require additional monitoring to ensure the case is properly routed through the patent office's administrative systems.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KHATIB, RAMI 1 77.1% +13.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18854158 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AIR CONDITIONER USING COMFORTABLE TEMPERATURE AND SYSTEM COMPRISING THE APPARATUS KHATIB, RAMI —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18854158 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AIR CONDITIONER USING COMFORTABLE TEMPERATURE AND SYSTEM COMPRISING THE APPARATUS KHATIB, RAMI —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18854158 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AIR CONDITIONER USING COMFORTABLE TEMPERATURE AND SYSTEM COMPRISING THE APPARATUS KHATIB, RAMI — §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2024

Managing Seedn Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month