Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Seohan Innobility Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating no overlap in personnel or administrative groups. HALL, HANA VICTORIA is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, which represents half of the company's current workload.
This one-to-one ratio between 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners indicates that the company's current patent pipeline is entirely decentralized. The involvement of 2 distinct art units further suggests that the matters are being reviewed in different technical environments. This lack of concentration means that the company's immediate prosecution results are dependent on the independent reviews of different individuals.
For the practitioner, this structure suggests that there is no single administrative path or examiner relationship to prioritize. Instead, the strategy must be tailored to the specific historical patterns of both HALL, HANA VICTORIA and the other assigned examiner. The absence of overlap in the 2 distinct art units means that procedural experiences may vary significantly between the pending matters.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALL, HANA VICTORIA | 1 | 71.4% | +66.7% |
| IRVIN, SHEA WOODROW | 1 | 60.0% | -11.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18610054 | VEHICULAR BRAKE-BY-WIRE SYSTEM | IRVIN, SHEA WOODROW | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19193554 | WHEEL CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING A WHEEL USING THE SAME | HALL, HANA VICTORIA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3664 | 1 |
| 4100 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19193554 | WHEEL CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING A WHEEL USING THE SAME | HALL, HANA VICTORIA | 3664 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 29, 2025 |
| 18610054 | VEHICULAR BRAKE-BY-WIRE SYSTEM | IRVIN, SHEA WOODROW | 4100 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSeohan Innobility Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Hana Victoria Hall has the most, with 1 of Seohan Innobility Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
