Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Servicetitan Inc. has 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 3 actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is currently reviewing one application. The portfolio spans 2 distinct art units, showing some technical breadth within the sector. This distribution ensures that each of the 3 pending office actions receives individual attention from a different examiner.
DELIGI, VANESSA LIMA is identified as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. This distribution shows that no single examiner is overwhelmed by the company's current filings, as each of the 3 distinct examiners handles only one case. The 3 pending office actions are spread across 2 distinct art units, suggesting the company's innovations touch on multiple sub-specialties. By engaging 3 distinct examiners, Servicetitan Inc. benefits from a variety of perspectives even with a small number of 3 pending office actions. This strategy helps to mitigate the risk of a single examiner's interpretation dominating the company's current prosecution efforts in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (33%) |
| §101 + other | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DELIGI, VANESSA LIMA | 1 | 56.4% | +37.0% |
| SINGH, RUPANGINI | 1 | 35.4% | +52.2% |
| MITROS, ANNA MAE | 1 | 36.1% | +48.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18882222 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIGITAL CATALOG MANAGEMENT | SINGH, RUPANGINI | 1d overdue |
| 17868287 | AUTOMATED GENERATION OF SERVICE ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS | MITROS, ANNA MAE | 19d |
| 19195063 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRONIC CATALOG MANAGEMENT | DELIGI, VANESSA LIMA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18882222 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIGITAL CATALOG MANAGEMENT | SINGH, RUPANGINI | 1d overdue |
| 17868287 | AUTOMATED GENERATION OF SERVICE ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS | MITROS, ANNA MAE | 19d |
| 19195063 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRONIC CATALOG MANAGEMENT | DELIGI, VANESSA LIMA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| 3689 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19195063 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRONIC CATALOG MANAGEMENT | DELIGI, VANESSA LIMA | — | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 30, 2025 |
| 18882222 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIGITAL CATALOG MANAGEMENT | SINGH, RUPANGINI | 3628 | §101§103§112DP | Final Rejection | 1d overdue | Pending | Sep 11, 2024 |
| 17868287 | AUTOMATED GENERATION OF SERVICE ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS | MITROS, ANNA MAE | 3689 | §101 | Final Rejection | 19d | Pending | Jul 19, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial