Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 0 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Shanghai Ruipu Energy Co. Ltd. holds a company patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio currently has 4 pending office actions, which are being reviewed by 4 distinct examiners. This indicates that every pending matter is being handled by a different individual, providing a range of examiner perspectives across the active applications.
Despite the number of examiners, all pending office actions are located within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests a concentrated technical focus within the Chemistry & Materials field. BAIRD, CAMERON MICHAEL is identified as the busiest examiner, although the workload is distributed among the 4 distinct examiners involved in the portfolio.
Practitioners should note that while the pending office actions are with different examiners, they all follow the standards of the same art unit. This allows for a consistent technical strategy across the portfolio. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that the company must address the individual feedback from different people, including BAIRD, CAMERON MICHAEL, to resolve the 4 pending office actions.
Reviewing the history of the 4 distinct examiners within the Chemistry & Materials space can help anticipate potential hurdles. Effective communication with the assigned examiners is essential to clarify technical nuances and reach a favorable outcome. Monitoring the status of all pending office actions is vital for timely adjustments to the broader intellectual property strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAIRD, CAMERON MICHAEL | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| VENTURA HERNANDEZ, DOUGLAS EDENILSON | 1 | — | — |
| WINCHESTER, WILLIAM JOHI | 1 | — | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18607058 | Battery Box, Battery Pack and Energy Storage Container | BAIRD, CAMERON MICHAEL | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18607058 | Battery Box, Battery Pack and Energy Storage Container | BAIRD, CAMERON MICHAEL | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 |
| 18521857 | Method for Preparing In-Situ Polymerized Semi-Solid State Battery | VENTURA HERNANDEZ, DOUGLAS EDENILSON | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 28, 2023 |
| 18521935 | Battery Cell, Battery and Electric Device | WINCHESTER, WILLIAM JOHI | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 28, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial