Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Shenzhen Weisideng E-Commerce Co. Ltd. is currently active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company's patent prosecution is focused on 1 pending office action, indicating a very specific and limited engagement with the USPTO at this time. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, which allows for a direct and concentrated response strategy. This point of contact at the patent office can often lead to a more efficient resolution of the issues raised during the examination process.
The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, ensuring that the technical evaluation is conducted by a single specialized group of experts. HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action. For practitioners, this data points to a straightforward prosecution scenario where the focus is entirely on addressing the requirements of 1 examiner in 1 specific technical field. Success in this matter will likely depend on a precise response that satisfies the technical standards of the assigned art unit and the specific concerns of the busiest examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 1 | 61.4% | +22.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18657369 | LOW WIND-RESISTANCE CANOPY TENT | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 25d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18657369 | LOW WIND-RESISTANCE CANOPY TENT | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 25d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3636 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18657369 | LOW WIND-RESISTANCE CANOPY TENT | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 3636 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 25d overdue | Pending | May 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial