Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Shenzhen Xworld Technology Limited operates a patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The company has 1 pending office action currently under review. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a very focused prosecution environment. Such a concentration suggests that the company's intellectual property strategy is currently centered on a specific technical niche within the broader Chemistry & Materials field.
SLIFKA, COLIN W is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action. Because the company has only 1 pending office action, SLIFKA, COLIN W is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently active. The outcome of this chemistry portfolio is currently subject to the specific examination standards of this 1 distinct examiner. For a practitioner, this implies that understanding the historical allowance rates and preferences of SLIFKA, COLIN W is critical for predicting the success of the 1 pending office action.
The presence of only the 1 distinct art unit further reinforces the specialized nature of the company's current filings. With the pending office action as the only active matter, the company's immediate legal focus is streamlined. This lack of diversity in examiners and art units simplifies the management of the portfolio but also increases the impact of any single decision made by the assigned examiner within the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLIFKA, COLIN W | 1 | 67.4% | +16.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18456282 | MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR COMPONENTS OF LITHIUM BATTERIES | SLIFKA, COLIN W | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18456282 | MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR COMPONENTS OF LITHIUM BATTERIES | SLIFKA, COLIN W | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1732 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18456282 | MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR COMPONENTS OF LITHIUM BATTERIES | SLIFKA, COLIN W | 1732 | §102§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 25, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialShenzhen Xworld Technology Limited has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Colin W Slifka has the most, with 1 of Shenzhen Xworld Technology Limited's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
