Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Siemens Mobility Austria GmbH

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 1 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Siemens Mobility Austria GmbH is currently managing 4 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 4 actions are distributed among 4 distinct examiners, meaning each pending case is being reviewed by a different person. All 4 pending office actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a very specific technical focus for the company's current active cases.

SMITH, JASON CHRISTOPHER is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently responsible for 1 pending office action. This 1 action is the maximum number of cases assigned to any individual examiner in this set. The presence of 4 distinct examiners within a single art unit suggests that while the technology is concentrated, the workload is spread across multiple reviewers.

Practitioners should be prepared to handle 4 different examination styles for the 4 pending office actions, despite them all residing in 1 distinct art unit. Since the busiest examiner, SMITH, JASON CHRISTOPHER, only has 1 pending office action, there is no single examiner with a majority of the company's cases. This distribution of 4 pending office actions across 4 distinct examiners requires a case by case approach to prosecution within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
2
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SMITH, JASON CHRISTOPHER 1 83.6% +13.0%
BUFFINGTON, HEAVEN RICHELLE 1 83.6% +13.4%
MESHAKA, MAXWELL L 1 86.4% +15.7%
BELLINGER, JASON R 1 70.0% +18.7%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18868241 Rail Vehicle with Pneumatic Suspension SMITH, JASON CHRISTOPHER —
18579079 Large Component for a Rail Vehicle MESHAKA, MAXWELL L —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18287901 Wheel for a Chassis of a Rail Vehicle, Chassis for Rail Vehicles and Method for Producing the Wheel for the Chassis of the Rail Vehicle BELLINGER, JASON R 7d
18696727 Rail Vehicle Having a Carriage Coupling Device BUFFINGTON, HEAVEN RICHELLE —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18287901 Wheel for a Chassis of a Rail Vehicle, Chassis for Rail Vehicles and Method for Producing the Wheel for the Chassis of the Rail Vehicle BELLINGER, JASON R 7d
18868241 Rail Vehicle with Pneumatic Suspension SMITH, JASON CHRISTOPHER —
18696727 Rail Vehicle Having a Carriage Coupling Device BUFFINGTON, HEAVEN RICHELLE —
18579079 Large Component for a Rail Vehicle MESHAKA, MAXWELL L —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3615 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18868241 Rail Vehicle with Pneumatic Suspension SMITH, JASON CHRISTOPHER — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 22, 2024
18696727 Rail Vehicle Having a Carriage Coupling Device BUFFINGTON, HEAVEN RICHELLE — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2024
18579079 Large Component for a Rail Vehicle MESHAKA, MAXWELL L 3615 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 12, 2024
18287901 Wheel for a Chassis of a Rail Vehicle, Chassis for Rail Vehicles and Method for Producing the Wheel for the Chassis of the Rail Vehicle BELLINGER, JASON R 3615 §102§103 Final Rejection 7d Pending Oct 23, 2023

Managing Siemens Mobility Austria GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month