Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 29 patents granted in the last 365 days
Signet Health Corporation manages 4 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These 4 actions are split among 4 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units. This distribution shows that each pending matter is being handled by a different examiner in a different technical group at the USPTO.
Paul Kim is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. With 4 pending actions and 4 distinct examiners, the workload is perfectly distributed across the identified individuals. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that no single examiner holds a dominant position over the company's current filings.
The use of 4 distinct art units for 4 pending office actions indicates a lack of technical overlap in the company's current pending filings. Practitioners should be prepared to manage 4 distinct examiner relationships, each potentially bringing a different perspective to the prosecution. This structure requires a coordinated approach to ensure consistency across the 4 different art units involved in the Computing & Software field.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (50%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIM, PAUL | 1 | 73.0% | +19.9% |
| HUYNH, EMILY | 1 | 21.9% | +43.6% |
| BAKER, IRENE H | 1 | 53.2% | +26.0% |
| KNIGHT, LETORIA G | 1 | 28.3% | +49.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19330314 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING OUTLIER DATA AND GENERATING CORRECTIVE ACTION | KIM, PAUL | — |
| 18964115 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MODIFYING A VISUALIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH SUBJECT DATA | HUYNH, EMILY | — |
| 18957824 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR RESOLVING DATA DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN A FIRST DATA STRUCTURE AND A SECOND DATA STRUCTURE | BAKER, IRENE H | — |
| 18957818 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING USER-SENSITIVE OPERATIONS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | KNIGHT, LETORIA G | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19330314 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING OUTLIER DATA AND GENERATING CORRECTIVE ACTION | KIM, PAUL | — |
| 18964115 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MODIFYING A VISUALIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH SUBJECT DATA | HUYNH, EMILY | — |
| 18957824 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR RESOLVING DATA DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN A FIRST DATA STRUCTURE AND A SECOND DATA STRUCTURE | BAKER, IRENE H | — |
| 18957818 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING USER-SENSITIVE OPERATIONS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | KNIGHT, LETORIA G | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2166 | 1 |
| 3683 | 1 |
| 2154 | 1 |
| 3623 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19330314 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING OUTLIER DATA AND GENERATING CORRECTIVE ACTION | KIM, PAUL | 2166 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 16, 2025 |
| 18964115 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MODIFYING A VISUALIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH SUBJECT DATA | HUYNH, EMILY | 3683 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 29, 2024 |
| 18957824 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR RESOLVING DATA DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN A FIRST DATA STRUCTURE AND A SECOND DATA STRUCTURE | BAKER, IRENE H | 2154 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 24, 2024 |
| 18957818 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING USER-SENSITIVE OPERATIONS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | KNIGHT, LETORIA G | 3623 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial