Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sinox Company Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which indicates a centralized prosecution effort. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current patent activity is confined to a specific technical group within the USPTO.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. As there is only one such matter in total, this examiner handles the entirety of the company's current pending workload. This relationship between the individual examiner and the pending matter simplifies the prosecution landscape.
Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of the 1 distinct examiner and the standards of the 1 distinct art unit. Because the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area is the sole technology area represented, the company's current legal efforts are technically unified. The presence of the single pending office action means that the company's immediate success in this area depends entirely on the outcome of this one proceeding.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY | 1 | 55.1% | +39.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18631111 | ELECTRONIC CONTROL COMPOUND LOCK | WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18631111 | ELECTRONIC CONTROL COMPOUND LOCK | WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3675 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18631111 | ELECTRONIC CONTROL COMPOUND LOCK | WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY | 3675 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial