Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Siteimprove A/S currently has 1 pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. This active matter is being examined by 1 distinct examiner, BURKE, TIONNA M, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The prosecution is localized in 1 distinct art unit, which provides the technical framework for the company's current patent application.
The portfolio's current activity is limited to 1 pending office action, indicating a specific focus within the Computing & Software sector. Because the company is working with 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution process is streamlined. BURKE, TIONNA M is responsible for the 1 pending office action, making her the primary point of contact for the company's current legal efforts.
Having 1 pending office action across 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company is not currently facing the complexity of multiple simultaneous examinations. The interaction with 1 distinct examiner, BURKE, TIONNA M, represents the full extent of the company's active prosecution. This concentration allows for a dedicated focus on the technical requirements of the single art unit involved in the Computing & Software field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BURKE, TIONNA M | 1 | 53.6% | +20.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18493474 | WEBSITE PLUGIN AND FRAMEWORK FOR CONTENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES | BURKE, TIONNA M | 1d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2178 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18493474 | WEBSITE PLUGIN AND FRAMEWORK FOR CONTENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES | BURKE, TIONNA M | 2178 | §103 | Final Rejection | 1d overdue | Pending | Oct 24, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial