Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Sld Technology Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This workload is distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a diverse examination environment for the company's current filings. This distribution suggests that each pending matter is being handled in a separate technical niche within the broader technology area.
KABIR, SAAD M is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Because the total count of pending matters is 2 and the busiest examiner holds 1, the prosecution burden is evenly split among the 2 distinct examiners. Practitioners should note that no single examiner dominates the current pipeline, requiring individualized strategies for each of the 2 distinct art units involved. The focus on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area suggests a specialized portfolio strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KABIR, SAAD M | 1 | 68.5% | +24.3% |
| ADAMOS, THEODORE V | 1 | 55.4% | +44.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19061650 | MODULAR PATIENT LIFT SYSTEM | KABIR, SAAD M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17532251 | EQUIPMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM AND METHOD OF SUPPORTING EQUIPMENT | ADAMOS, THEODORE V | 72d overdue |
| 19061650 | MODULAR PATIENT LIFT SYSTEM | KABIR, SAAD M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3673 | 1 |
| 3635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19061650 | MODULAR PATIENT LIFT SYSTEM | KABIR, SAAD M | 3673 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 24, 2025 |
| 17532251 | EQUIPMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM AND METHOD OF SUPPORTING EQUIPMENT | ADAMOS, THEODORE V | 3635 | §102§103DP | Non-Final OA | 72d overdue | Pending | Nov 22, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial