Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (60%) |
| §112 only | 1 (20%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLYNN, RANDY A | 1 | 65.2% | +16.5% |
| BAYARD, DJENANE M | 1 | 83.7% | +1.3% |
| PATEL, DHAIRYA A | 1 | 71.2% | +28.4% |
| DAVIS, CHENEA | 1 | 72.1% | +16.1% |
| SHANG, ANNAN Q | 1 | 70.8% | +10.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18824785 | STREAMING SYSTEM DEVICE AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | BAYARD, DJENANE M | 26d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18935307 | AUTOMATED DIGITAL ADVERTISEMENT REPLACEMENT | FLYNN, RANDY A | 3d overdue |
| 18780905 | MULTIMODAL TRANSFER BETWEEN AUDIO AND VIDEO STREAMS | PATEL, DHAIRYA A | 16d |
| 18449976 | PREFETCHING ADVERTISEMENTS FOR STREAMING DELIVERY | DAVIS, CHENEA | 27d |
| 17976433 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROGRAM SOURCE DISPLAY | SHANG, ANNAN Q | 41d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2424 | 2 |
| 2444 | 1 |
| 2453 | 1 |
| 2421 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18935307 | AUTOMATED DIGITAL ADVERTISEMENT REPLACEMENT | FLYNN, RANDY A | 2424 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 3d overdue | Pending | Nov 01, 2024 |
| 18824785 | STREAMING SYSTEM DEVICE AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | BAYARD, DJENANE M | 2444 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 26d overdue | Pending | Sep 04, 2024 |
| 18780905 | MULTIMODAL TRANSFER BETWEEN AUDIO AND VIDEO STREAMS | PATEL, DHAIRYA A | 2453 | §103 | Final Rejection | 16d | Pending | Jul 23, 2024 |
| 18449976 | PREFETCHING ADVERTISEMENTS FOR STREAMING DELIVERY | DAVIS, CHENEA | 2421 | §112 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Aug 15, 2023 |
| 17976433 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROGRAM SOURCE DISPLAY | SHANG, ANNAN Q | 2424 | Other | Final Rejection | 41d | Pending | Oct 28, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial